Looking at the source, it might be a bit tricky to do correctly.The advantage is that the runtime cost is smaller, the keys don't leak to the open, there is cryptographic encryption, and it's harder to break for malicious agents. During the validation, they mutate the content of then build. They have a script that validates the license key in Node.js, before the build of the assets. Can customers still download the older versions with the npm client? Or do they lose all access? 3. What happens at the end of the free update duration. Now, Kendo UI still has a public npm repository and asks for a free trial to go to a form to be licensed, we could always do the same. We don't collect lead information, people a sales team could call back, to gather feedback on how well it went.In some way, it can be great, this developer abusing the license for a side project might be more likely to get his employer's pay, they likely wouldn't have paid. We can't enforce that everybody is paying, it's going to be abused.The trial onboarding is smooth, there are no free trial forms to fill, no need to leave your personal information.We get social proofs, potential customers can see if we are a leading solution in the market or not.Regarding the advantages of a public repository, I can think of two: Remix relies on a private npm registry, where the license key unlocks its access. Remix-like approach: make everything private It's still the current approach, and the one used by or but at least, in the MUI repositories, developers can't copy the key. Some of the alternatives that we could consider: 1. How can I protect that in the future another developer can use my license when maintaining it? Do you have restrictions to using this license? Maybe domain-specific? We stored this license key in an Environment variable within our project, but it might be accessible by unwanted 3rd parties since it's stored on the frontend side. I bought MUI X Pro for myself, but if I push my code to GitLab every developer who works in my company can steal my license key and use it for free. We would like to know your recommendations about how to secure the license key in our SPAs. It could be great to update the documentation, it could gets us a long way already. We had to explain to them that it was by design, I'm not sure they feel great about it even with the explanation. We got customers raising this pain on private emails. The license key validation is done at runtime, consuming bundle size: Some customers don't feel great about leaking their license key to the open.However, the current approach comes with drawbacks: Exposing the license key publicly in a bundle is currently the expected outcome. The license key was designed to be public, the only thing we ask customers is not to proactively shoot out their license key to the world. The hard constraint is the international IP laws. We are discussing the improvement opportunities to improve the behavior of For the quick context, we use the license key as a reminder for developers to know they are not legally licensed, it's not a hard constraint. When the backup runs, the error will be seen when Backup Exec attempts to backup the BKUPEXEC instance because no Agent for Microsoft SQL Servers is present.This is a continuation of the thread in mui/material-ui#28106 (comment). That includes the Backup Exec SQL instance which is named BKUPEXEC by default. When the evaluation period expires, a license for the Agent for Microsoft SQL Servers is required to backup any SQL instance. Selecting the entire media server adds a selection for the Backup Exec SQL Instance. Only XP and Windows 2000 Professional boxes do not require a Remote Agent for Windows Servers Licensing key.Īnother common reason for this error is if Backup Exec is run in evaluation mode and the entire media server is selected for backup. When the evaluation period for the Backup Exec Remote Agent for Windows Servers has expired, a license is required for each Remote Agent being backed up from systems running Windows 2000 Server, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista and Windows 7. The error may also be seen if there is a problem within Backup Exec with an installed license. This can either be a missing Remote Agent license or a missing license for a database agent like Microsoft SQL or Microsoft Exchange. The appropriate license for a resource selected in the backup is not installed. Backups fail with error when the appropriate license key is not present for one or more job selections Error Messageįinal error: 0xe000fe3c - Before you can back up this resource, you must purchase and install a license key for the appropriate Backup Exec agent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |